Broader in scope than the S.F. City Attorney's
San Francisco, May 19, 2016—Today the California Federation of Teachers (CFT) filed an amended complaint with Superior Court Judge Curtis Karnow against the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges (ACCJC). The complaint, delayed for more than two years by ACCJC legal maneuvers, alleges a broad array of violations of federal laws and regulations, as well as California common law fair procedure, by the Commission. The plaintiffs, in addition to CFT, include several local community college faculty unions, a number of individual faculty members and a student.
City College of San Francisco students who testified on the damage ACCJC has caused their school to NACIQI in December.
Statement from CFT president Joshua Pechthalt
CFT applauds growing momentum for accreditor’s ouster
March 17, 2016—“Today California moved another step closer to reforming the broken accreditation system for California’s community colleges. With a more than 90% vote earlier this week to reform the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges (ACCJC), while preparing at the same time to move to another accreditor, community college presidents struck a decisive blow to ACCJC’s fading hopes of maintaining the unacceptable status quo.
CFT president Joshua Pechthalt, left, testified at the NACIQI meeting in Washington DC, along with Tim Killikelly and Alisa Messer. They were joined in this photo by AFT president Randi Weingarten, whose staff provided support while the delegation of Californians visited congressional offices seeking the delisting of ACCJC.
December 17, 2015—Yesterday CFT president Joshua Pechthalt, staff member Jessica Ulstad, former CFT president Marty Hittelman, and faculty, students and trustees from City College of San Francisco spoke before the National Advisory Committee on Institutional Quality and Integrity (NACIQI), which oversees regional accreditors such as the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges (ACCJC).
The Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges, which oversees accreditation of community colleges in California, has been troubled by allegations for years that its methods are arbitrary and punitive. Faculty have charged that the ACCJC, instead of helping to improve the delivery of education, diverts massive amounts of attention, time, taxpayer dollars and resources away from the classroom to “compliance,” much of which has little, if anything, to do with education. The Commission’s work is also, they say, responsible for deteriorating relations between faculty and administrators fearful of ACCJC sanctions, which occur at a startlingly higher rate here than in regions overseen by other accreditation agencies.
Perhaps the most egregious example of the inconsistent and disparate ways ACCJC treats colleges is a comparison between City College of San Francisco and Heald College. The agency broke the law in its overzealous attempt to close an excellent school (CCSF), while looking the other way as a lawbreaking school (Heald, operated by Corinthian) preyed on thousands of students. Both instances ended with similar catastrophic results: thousands of poor and working class students were denied an education.
In 2013 the CFT challenged the Commission in a formal process known as “third party comment,” in which interested parties can file a complaint with the commission and with the U.S. Department of Education. CFT also filed suit, seeking an injunction to keep City College of San Francisco open, as did the City Attorney of San Francisco. An injunction was granted on January 2, 2014. The trial ended with a February, 2015 Superior Court decision affirming that ACCJC broke four laws in denying CCSF due process rights during accreditation review. The judge ordered ACCJC to offer CCSF another opportunity to respond to its review, this time with transparency. Since then, reform legislation is moving through the state legislature; the state Chancellor's task force report recommended that California find a new accreditor; the Board of Governors adopted the report and is committed to having a plan in place by March 2016; and the Department of Education body that oversees ACCJC extended its authority to accredit by just six months, pending resolution of numberous compliance issues.
Below are links to stories and documents that explain what CFT and its locals—and a growing number of other organizations, elected officials and interested observers like the State Auditor and the Community College Board of Governors—are doing to change the ACCJC’s behavior, and what the Commission has been doing (or not doing) in response.
Accrediting Commission Again Denies Due Process, August 6, 2015
Third party comments, amendments, and lawsuit
CFT members and friends outside the California Community College Board of Governors meeting on September 21 in Sacramento, where the Board voted to tell the US Department of Education that California needs a new accreditor
September 22, 2015—Yesterday the California Community College Board of Governors (BOG) directed State Community Chancellor Brice Harris to send his Accreditation Task Force's Report, issued two weeks ago, to the United States Department of Education (DOE). The Report, citing a multitude of failures by the current California community college accreditor, the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges, recommends that California replace the ACCJC with a new agency.
August 28, 2015—Today the Community College Chancellor released his long awaited Accreditation Task Force report, and the news was not good for the Accrediting Commission for Community and Junior Colleges (ACCJC). Bottom line: the task force, a blue ribbon group representing faculty, administrators, elected officials and other stakeholders, is recommending that the ACCJC be replaced by another accrediting agency.